In an Italian city there is a bar.
Inside the bar there is a pool table.
Place the pool, four people playing bottles. Others are around to watch and make a few comments from time to time.
often speak in dialect or any dialect with a strong cadence.
If you talk politics, are competing to see who is more "against". They are used all the clichés as corny to declare against. Who against immigrants, accused of making the mob, who against judges, accused of making policy.
Remind them that the immigrants pay, on average, the taxes of the Italians, there is not anything for them, the extra words, and clandestine underworld are almost synonymous. Remind them that judges now put on the grill by Berlusconi are the same that made "clean hands", disintegrating at the time the ruling party (DC and PSI) and thereby opening up space for his advent in politics, it produces only discomfort.
The race between them comes down to who is and who is most antimagistratura antiimmigrazione.
They have a broad political representation in the League and in much of the PDL.
Next to the bar, there is another local wine shop. Inside
tables apparently homemade, but fine. The environment is friendly, yet elegant. You do not scream, it whispers. The atmosphere is one of the tavern, the price to Chez Maxime.
do not talk dialect, but an Italian wanted.
The diners, while denying it, you feel enlightened. They are convinced to be an elite.
If they talk about music, do not allude to Tiziano Ferro and Laura Pausini, no, too popular. They hear chants boring, but original: they must stand out. If they speak of television, do not allude to the best-known programs, no national-popular too, can draw up to a few episodes of Ballarò, but also on what they have to say. Sometimes they mention the last film with Polish subtitles in French. Not the film excites them, excites them to talk about the fact. In a
Montalcino and Sassicaia, talking about the rally against Berlusconi, according to them, should resign. The fact that the majority of voters, aware of the legal problems of the same, they have voted for them does not matter: the rules of democracy are valid only when their side wins.
their newspapers on the table (the most common in Italy), almost entirely devoted to the legal problems of the Premier, argue that in Italy there is no press freedom.
not understand that their position is not the majority. Consider who has a position different from theirs or in bad faith or ill-equipped.
Some of them, illuminatissima seized by intuition and benevolent, he says, but I also know good people who voted for Berlusconi! But vah?!? His goodness.
They have a wide representation in the political left, Di Pietro, a large part of the PD, from his former secretary, Dario Franceschini.
Faced with two rooms, they spend a lot of people. Normal people, who have no prejudice against foreigners, nor magistrates, that those who believe that the majority of votes must be able to govern.
Among them, some voted for Veltroni and then appreciated the early months of the Berlusconi government, especially when compared to the misery of the government that preceded it.
Some of them try to talk shyly with those of the bar, but is measured with a sense of vulgarity, meanness and arrogance that suggests not to continue the conversation.
Others try to have a chat with the enoteca. The result is no better: only six of those who do not understand them, look at you with distrust and a sense of pity. The atmosphere of totalitarianism.
Those loops have no desire to cry out against the magistrates, against immigrants, against a head of government. They want a policy that represents them, that combines hospitality, justice, respect for democratic rules. Do not cry, they prefer to listen to. But they have not much to listen: they have no political representation, even though lately, some voice rises: D'Alema, Casini, Fini, Napolitano. Voices seem less and less shy.
They are for the possibility of an extra chance of success in our country, is to give the possibility for judges to do their duty, are to ensure the ability to rule by those who enjoy the majority consensus.
These simple people, go back to their families, watch TV, listen to a song by Tiziano Ferro and Laura Pausini, gladly pay the contributions to the foreign caregiver and try to live their lives without being prisoners of the dogmas of their grandparents.
They are the heroes of normality.
If so critical at this stage of life of our country will be exceeded, will be mainly thanks to their faith and their patience. They have one hope: that intolerance remains confined to the vulgar intolerance snooty wine shop and bar.