Fiat workers a chance to increase the weight of the left
interview Stefano Galieni to Roberta Fantozzi
After one week of voting Mirafiori much has happened.
It 's true, but that vote must go and must continue to emphasize the value, rejecting the attempts of ambition, to make it clear from the chaotic noise of the communication media. As has been pointed out, even at Mirafiori recententemente mobilizations were more difficult than elsewhere, the heavier the apparatus of control, the higher the average age of workers. That result, in the deadly blackmail fielded, is the demonstration of the level of awareness and willingness to fight that exists in the factories of this country. The awareness that we are at a transition "history" where in the largest post-war crisis, the attempt is to determine a regression in the materiality of the deadly work conditions and rights of the worker, making a clean sweep of both the industrial relations of the Constitution. The willingness to fight is the one that has arisen in the completion of this awareness, interweaving with the role played by the Fiom: the investment of trust gained in the field by Fiom in each step of these very difficult months, identify it as "the union" and more. Since it is clear that particularly since the October 16 demonstration, the ability to link movements to submit an alternative platform altogether determine the facts in a substitution role of policy: a policy that is on the wrong side or that, if is on the right side, not the level of effectiveness that would be necessary.
The act goes on attack in .
Statements of Federmeccanica which was followed by those of Confindustria explicit, without veils, what is the goal "System", a goal entirely understandable since the separate story on the contract system, which certainly has been a spurt Fiat extreme. It 's amazing that in the face of Pomigliano has said that this was an exception and that even after it is thought that after all the logic of the new company concerned large multinational corporations but not the whole company, as he tried to reassert Director General of Federmeccanica. The replacement of the national corporate contract, means the breaking of any interest to workers in small businesses and a butcher shop where the union is weak or nonexistent. Corporatization and individualization of the Reports work are the explicit goal, pursued by both Federmeccanica and Confindustria, the government and the labor legislation that was approved. Just think of the Linked Work and give the push that individualisation of the employment relationship. He said a companion last national activities, which is a good bet that the workers who will be individually summarized by the new company, the contract will also find the arbitration clause: that which refers to any dispute to arbitration and prevents access to the courts . While on the other hand the draft statute for workers, by which formally does not affect the rights, waived depending on the economic situation: the rights become legally dependent variables on the market! Corporatization and individualization of labor relations and set a clean sweep of the individual and collective rights, as recognized by law and the Constitution. The workplace and society, transformed into barracks, where those who work in small arms is in competition with other arms without autonomy, possibilities for organizing collective rights. Instead of giving rights to those who are uncertain, what is happening is an attempt to generalize, worsening the condition of blackmail that the instability requires dramatically today to millions of people.
How do you counter an attack of this reach?
There are several levers that must act. Fiom rightly said that now, since if you do not vote Mirafiori reopened the negotiations, would have covered all avenues, including the judiciary. The diktat of Mirafiori and Pomigliano to offer wide area, since there are still laws and Constitution. Non-application of regulations on the sale of a business - the foundation of the whole operation newco - sickness, right to strike and freedom of association: there is something for everyone! Then there is the trade union and political struggle. The strike and the demonstrations of 28 will be very important and extremely positive on that date there has been a convergence of grassroots unions, while the need for the CGIL Squaderno proclaim a general strike. There is no way that it does not conflict in a given field and durable, so all the conditions are, however, as evidenced by their willingness to fight the extraordinary in the vote of Mirafiori and Pomigliano before, in the increasing resistance that is determined in this country. As shown in the new movement of students and temporary workers. The management right of the crisis component of a social model that undermines the substance of the Constitution is an opposite movement of another constituent social model. Moreover, in many moves, multiply the answers: United by the crisis, the establishment of Labour and Freedom, the appeal of Micromega. There are conditions for the construction of a mass political movement against the return to 800 and for an alternative.
And politics?
The PD showed the point at which the mutation has arrived. Crippling coexistence of different lines is evident not only how heavy it had not challenged the social-liberal system, but the pieces of material interest that specifically refer to that party. This confirms the correctness of our analysis on the impossibility of a perspective government with that party and is Squaderno the need to rebuild a political representation in the workplace. A challenge for us in a process of reconstruction of the maximum possible relations unit to the left, with the arc of forces at Mirafiori said NO. Building relations unit, to accelerate in a political framework in which all the more opaque it is possible that the fall of the government is on the agenda and this is a lens decisive, but in the meantime there is the usual presence in the PD options different and, to listen to the interview of Enrico Letta a few days ago, the major priorities of research alliances with the third prong.
Rebuilding the political representation of world of work and the best cards with this objective reporting unit, means questioning on what project, which wires to pull, and the crisis in the specific features of Italian capitalism.
There are four nodes in my view, inescapable.
The first is democracy, because democracy means the set-up of power and therefore as the weight of the interests in society. The need for a law on union democracy, modeled on the proposal of the Fiom, goes along with the need to overcome the bipolar. The two things are held more than it is clarified. The necessity of reappropriation of workers to decide on their working condition, is the necessity of reappropriation of the citizens of the land of political representation inhibited by the majority today, that is, whether you build coalitions Islam by force as the main criterion is to take a vote more than others, by the type of deployments. Moreover, the bipolarity comes to proof by the institutional sphere of social conflict.
The second is the need to reform the world of work. With its implications on the ground of the contracts and the type of labor relations. Reunification of the categories, drastic reduction in the number of labor relations and reaffirmation of the centrality of the relationship of indefinite duration, the renewal of the false self-employment to the protection of employees.
The third is an initiative for a radical redistribution of wealth in a country where the gap is unsustainable levels. If the fifteen richest OECD countries the share of wages in GDP has declined by 10 percentage points between 1976 and 2006 in Italy fell by 15 in favor of annuities. So balance sheet, income taxation, tax evasion.
The fourth channel resources to public production of public goods: industrial policies, knowledge and welfare. Industrial policies, because the low labor productivity in Italy is the result of "small is beautiful" in past years, and absence of investment in product innovation, which radicalized the competition in saturated areas. Because the ecological crisis makes sovraordinante the conversion of the economy and industrial sectors. Public Policy: an audience to be renewed in the name of transparency and participation, to rebuild the capacity of intervention in the economy that it brings into question the dominance of globalized capitalism. Knowledge: to rehabilitate the productive apparatus, but also for a society of free men and women. Extension of the welfare state: income is on the ground that the enlargement of the sphere of social services in a country where young women experience a significantly worse condition the rest of Europe.
Not very unrealistic situation in which we live?
We know that the balance of power are very far from the possibility of achieving these goals tomorrow and that the processes, not least the heavy decline in the European context, are going in the opposite direction. What is to be built in the meantime, common sense is the knowledge that those policies destroy society and radicalize the crisis. The business model of industrial relations in the United States that you want to import in Italy, with the heavy compression of wages and rights that you have determined, is a cause of the crisis and therefore can not be the solution. We should be able to fix. It does something that the International Monetary Fund to notice in a report in late September last year, that unemployment is unsustainable as it is the growth of inequalities, the crisis is to demand and exports can not substitute for domestic demand, which countries that have introduced more flexible working are paying a higher price in terms of unemployment, restrictive fiscal policies that affect generalized recovery. This was not because, to quote Wallerstein, the IMF, has become "the spokesman of the world left." But it is clear that instability is very high given the crisis and it is equally clear that serves to identify a comprehensive program to rebuild a different common sense and therefore the subjective conditions necessary for a possibility of change.
add a final point, last not least. There is a need to build a framework that holds together these proposals. I think that should be discussed much more to the left what was called in the call this summer the 250 economists and Emiliano Brancaccio in particular has repeatedly made clear: the end of the hegemony of free-swinging, not through the recipe for political protectionist classic that are activated as well - although it is true that in the last two years were hired 332 new protectionist measures at international level - but the idea that it is legitimate to restore mechanisms controlling and limiting the movement of capital, on financial grounds, the investment and trade in goods, where there is sufficient remuneration of labor. A proposal can also be extended to the field of social and environmental protection, and also translated into a technically defined mechanism. If the neo-liberal globalization has been the freedom of capital to field a gigantic process of wage dumping and tax going around the world where it was cheaper, it is assumed that this must be questioned.
How do you combine a project of this type with the "here and now"?
I believe that good ideas are long - as it is essential to equip the strength across Europe - and together serve also practice court. Having a plan is essential to stay in the construction of the conflict and movements. And there are positive signs, even for what concerns us. This party that has spent lavishly in the construction of 16 October, is also strongly in the field now for 28 January. Commitment of partners at Mirafiori in Turin, 130 banquet held in the Veneto to support on 28, to the many ongoing initiatives. It is changing its skin. I was struck by a political committee devoted entirely to disputes in Emilia, the construction of movement, social practices. Many talented young people, and stories also loads of emotion. Like when a friend said that the money collected by orange metalmenccanica to support a dispute, were given by those workers to migrant workers employed by another company, in the factory for cleaning. As if to say to break the field divisions and in reweaving of solidarity, to overthrow the imagination of the scapegoat. Project, conflict, construction of a political and social alternative left.
by Liberation.