Monica VistaLite
At different times and by different routes, I received three letters in his hands , all Italian citizens in Venezuela. One was written a few years ago, the other straddling the recent visit of Foreign Minister Franco Frattini in the country. That of Anthony Coiro, a tribute to 'proceso Revolucionario' crying in large letters ¡ Aprovechemos Chávez !, clashes with the complaints of Marco Polesen responsible for promoting the Northern League in Venezuela, and those of Mario Sebastiani, who throws stones against the Italian and Venezuelan.
Polesen, in summary, not agree that the Italian community meetings, in the minister of foreign affairs, Chavez and his socialist regime repressive filocubano, filoterrorista, illegal, unlawful and undemocratic , which promotes crime of terror as a weapon to paralyze the citizens - mixing words Polesen -. This is because the said Collective, 80 percent, "has voted for right." And the right not disengaged herself with the Communists, due to which our migrants, "naked and defenseless should address the homeland from which they are parties."
I would point out some things.
First I would point out 'scandal cards burnt' and the famous 'bonfire' of Aldo Micciche, where he lost thousands of votes to the candidate of the Democratic Party that - according to the fixer on the run, and it is not clear from What has never relied on - "is doing a whole propaganda in favor of Chavez." The percentages of right Polesen, therefore, should be clearly redefined. Moving on to the "regime" which tends to "stay too unlawful "- the reference is to the possibility of ricandidatura of political office - I would speak of the seven governments of De Gasperi, the seven of Andreotti, Berlusconi IV.
With these skeletons, and this recent history, how to write that today "in Venezuela there is a legal and legitimate government"? Would it not be the doom of those who see the mote in the eyes of others and not the beam in their own, in the words of an old proverb?
Undoubtedly Polesen may find allies among the ranks of our community. Right next to the minister, ready to take the word as 'representative of the Italian-Venezuelan', was the president of the CGIE, Hugh Martin. The same 'Ugo' was talking about Miccichè in interceptions, he was standing, proudly, in criticizing the Venezuelan president and his alleged "totalitarian tendencies". Without shame. Yet a few years ago, exactly 22 June 2005, Di Martino, along with In Collevecchio and Michael Coletta, if I remember, were with Chavez in Miraflores for the signature which decreed the establishment of the 'Day of friendship italovenezolana' . The embassy, \u200b\u200bon that occasion, said that "the representative bodies of the community" were "all united in their desire to establish a dialogue with the Venezuelan government." And then?
Another thing. Politics and relations between states - fortunately or not, I have yet to understand - are made of diplomacy. Leaders do not meet just because they are cute. Italy holds diplomatic relations with a country like China, which now calls the Expo 2015 in Milan. And the Asian country, with its horrific death sentences, imposed for fewer than 68 possible crimes, is hardly a paragon of virtue. Berlusconi also distributes bread as hugs and handshakes. In addition to Qaddafi, met Israel's Netanyahu and the Palestinian Abu Mazen, between one and the other Obama.
So, dear Polesen, the fact that Minister Frattini meets with Chávez must not offend. To console you, you can rethink the meetings between Pope John XXIII and Fidel Castro.
You could criticize the other hand, as does Mario Sebastiani, the "hasty, rhetoric and trivial meeting," foreign minister "with some members studied and least embarrassing" of the community. A meeting just to give a present, when the real reason for the trip was another "take money and put a piece of Contuy the matter." Diplomacy. Certainly, the fact that Di Martino, Miccichè after the scandal, is among the characters, "embarrassing" should make us all reflect on those who claim - at all levels - to represent us.
Representatives apart, Sebastiani that last week was a pointless meeting. "But do not take the piss with the travesty of the concerns" complaint. "Chavez does not allow us too disengaged herself and in the meantime we're taking away everything." Meanwhile, Italy is forgetting its citizens abroad (an "emergency communications" defines Sebastiani) and prove reluctant to distribute nationality and passport "would allow a bit 'more security in case of extreme necessity, see Cuba. "
The third letter, " Visión de un inmigrante. ¡Aprovechemos to Chavez! "uses much less aggressive tone and alarming to support the idea that in Venezuela you are seeing a" just social change, peaceful and democratic. A trend that we must, indeed, 'advantage' to realize what "others have made with wars and blood."
With words more soft than the other letters, responding to those who "parrot that oppose President Chávez has divided into two areas because the Venezuelan people." Anthony Coiro writes:
- Clearly there are two areas. I have eyes to see, ears to listen, but also the long memory to recall that even in the last 40 years there were two sectors. And the industry's most poor and abandoned eyes we used to see him, but never used ear to listen.
There is, therefore those who are not part of a supposed 80 per cent. Who is not invited to meet with ministers. Those who remain in Venezuela to live well, not to regret Italy. Who is to mix a people, not least a party of separations and divisions.
Mr Polesen, with thousands of flaws and contradictions evident, with errors of course voluntary and involuntary, Venezuela his path. Accompagnamolo. Participate and not sit down in the ranks of the spectators, rightly criticize without demonizing. Weighed words. Who is without sin, saying someone better than me and you, cast the first stone.
0 comments:
Post a Comment