again on the dominant culture of the VS and the timid voices of the culture of PER. The Chronicles
policies these days tell us about the proposal of the "short trial" and the ensuing controversy.
On the one hand, those who remember that Berlusconi has the slopes with justice and how this law would help him. They are against Berlusconi of being their fundamental identity.
other hand, those who remember that Berlusconi has been elected democratically and should thus be encouraged in its efforts to head of government. They are the judges of being "politicized" their fundamental identity.
These "biased against" have in common the same attitude: who is more VS is the purest, others are contaminated.
They also share the obviousness of their arguments: the benefits that would process short by the premier and the fact that he was elected democratically, there are political arguments, facts are obvious, banal platitudes.
The facts, however, if you want to advance in practice, not to be thrown against each other, should be managed. But managing them is harder and more complex, throwing is easier and simpler.
Voices from the pack? Voices that seek to go beyond the V, to the FOR?
few, but something you feel. Two particularly noteworthy. Pier Ferdinando Casini
:
"Everyone will assume responsibility 'and I also say the Democratic Party:' think about it, 'cause on the one hand there is' the breakdown of justice, saving the soul screaming and protesting, the other possibility 'to avoid this breakdown "
Massimo D'Alema:
' There is a antiberlusconismo that strays into a kind of anti-Italian sentiment. This conception of an enlightened elite who lives in a miserable country, and 'the worst approach, subordinate, we can have "
In the land of the Guelphs and Ghibellines, that's something.
0 comments:
Post a Comment